Inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy for bloodstream infections based on discordant in-vitro susceptibilities: a retrospective cohort analysis of prevalence, predictors, and mortality risk in US hospitals

  10 September 2020

Approximately one in five patients with bloodstream infections in US hospitals received discordant empirical antibiotic therapy, receipt of which was closely associated with infection with antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Receiving discordant empirical antibiotic therapy was associated with increased odds of mortality overall, even in patients without sepsis. Early identification of bloodstream pathogens and resistance will probably improve population-level outcomes.

Author(s): Sameer S Kadri, MD Yi Ling Lai, MPH Sarah Warner, MPH Jeffrey R Strich, MD Ahmed Babiker, MBBS Emily E Ricotta, PhD Cumhur Y Demirkale, PhD John P Dekker, MD Tara N Palmore, MD Chanu Rhee, MD Prof Michael Klompas, MD Prof David C Hooper, MD John H Powers 3rd, MD Arjun Srinivasan, MD Robert L Danner, MD Jennifer Adjemian, PhD
Healthy Patients  
Back

OUR UNDERWRITERS

Unrestricted financial support by:

Antimicrobial Resistance Fighter Coalition

Bangalore Bioinnovation Centre

INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURERS & ASSOCIATIONS

BD





AMR NEWS

Your Biweekly Source for Global AMR Insights!

Stay informed with the essential newsletter that brings together all the latest One Health news on antimicrobial resistance. Delivered straight to your inbox every two weeks, AMR NEWS provides a curated selection of international insights, key publications, and the latest updates in the fight against AMR.

Don’t miss out on staying ahead in the global AMR movement—subscribe now!

Subscribe

What is going on with AMR?
Stay tuned with remarkable global AMR news and developments!

Keep me informed